Page 2 of 3
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 08:23
by sandid
Here some fotos after transfering
[ATTACH=CONFIG]700[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]701[/ATTACH]
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 08:26
by sandid
Here some fotos after transfering
[ATTACH=CONFIG]702[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]703[/ATTACH]
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 08:39
by bms
sandid;35345 wrote:This is the sublimation ink that i used
XXX
100ml Sublimation ink
Their products： Ink
Classification: Bottled ink
Compatible code: Sublimation ink
Sublimation ink.
1.100ml TY Sublimation ink for all inkjet cartridge.
2.Ink colors:BK,C,M,Y,LC,LM.
3.Ink type:Sublimation ink.
4.Suitable for:EP,CN,BR,LM,LE,HP series inkjet cartridge. INK characteristic:This item of vigorous strengh adopts particular solvent is mainly suitable for cleaning all kinds of recycled inkjets printheads and inkjet nozzle. The moderate PH value enables the printhead being protected effectively. And it's very easy to operate the cleaning process.
From the "mod edit" then presumably this is not Sawgrass ink so there is no way of knowing what this ink really is. As they say in Dragons Den - "I'm out". As a supplier I can't comment on the suitability of non-sawgrass inks and can't help further.
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 08:43
by sandid
take a look of this site
http://xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcom.cn/[/[COLOR="#FF0000] please do not link to 3rd party inks[/COLOR]
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 09:56
by mrs maggot
whatever the ink, are you sure you are printing on the right side of the paper ???
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 10:00
by sandid
Mrs maggot : Of course
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 11:39
by sarahjayne
might seem a really obvious one - but I had to buy a second cheap fleabay press as the heat element went on my 30/30 press & I had to wait for one to be ordered. The new press works on farenheit not celsius - so I need about 390 degrees F for the 190 I'd usually use and it tends to need a longer dwell time.
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 14:28
by Justin
It's a very difficult situation to discuss. We can't use third party inks here in the UK dues to the small printer format Sawgrass patent so there is no official support available. This is why any mention/links etc. have been removed by our Moderator.
Looking at your pics I can only suggest what's been mentioned previously. Either the shirts aren't suitable (i.e. high polyester content) inks aren't sublimation ot the paper isn't releasing.
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 14:35
by pisquee
Presumably, if the original poster had said he was using an Epson 9600 and InkTec inks then we would be able to discuss his problem?
Re: result was not too satisfactory
Posted: 24 Dec 2011, 14:55
by Paul
pisquee;35371 wrote:Presumably, if the original poster had said he was using an Epson 9600 and InkTec inks then we would be able to discuss his problem?
we can discuss his problem
we just can not let any one to link to 3rd party inks. Personaly i dont care what printer, inks and paper somone use. But Job need to be done and links removed i am affraid.
No one said we only talk about problems that artanium inks cause as for this is sawgrass customer support