Explaining copyright to customers, no wonder they don't get it!

Can't find the right section? Discuss it in here!
socialgiraffe
Posts: 4597
Joined: 16 Jun 2011, 23:40
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: Explaining copyright to customers, no wonder they don't get it!

Post by socialgiraffe »

My take on this is that we're not responsible for policing copyright - if a customer comes to us with artwork, I just tell them that it's okay if they have permission to use it, I don't make a big issue of it.
That's one way to put it ;-)

I think a more suitable way of putting it is that we can not police copyright, it is impossible to do so. Asking someone if they have permission and pointing out the risks is about as far as you can go. Looking at something and saying "hey, that looks like a professional image" would be a very subjective view. Laws needs to be in "black and white" with no grey area.
USING: Whatever it takes to get the job done...
User avatar
logobear
Posts: 1694
Joined: 08 Feb 2010, 14:03
Contact:

Re: Explaining copyright to customers, no wonder they don't get it!

Post by logobear »

Drew,
I am inclined to agree with you, though I would rather like everything Social Geraff says to be true as it would make my business easier.....
It is rare on DyeSubForum for comments to be heated, and copywrite is so grey, I welcome you to this debate.
imho
1 Hour T-shirt printing shop in Newcastle upon Tyne.
http://www.logobear.co.uk/
Logobear t-shirt print and embroidery. 74 Clayton Street. Newcastle. NE1 5PG. UK
Andrew
Posts: 2086
Joined: 01 Dec 2009, 05:00
Contact:

Re: Explaining copyright to customers, no wonder they don't get it!

Post by Andrew »

Try uploading Man Utd in a red font onto a mug for tesco photo site and it will go through. Their terms and conditions for online ordering clearly put the legalities onto the person uploading an image.

Speak to someone like Deconetwork and they will also confirm who is responsible. At the end of the day it legally makes sense otherwise a printer would be to scared to print anything. Say someone took a photo in of someone they know like David Beckham which they know is probably dodgy. Then another customer walks in with a photo of someone they do not know but it is someone equally as famous. How would they know not to print the second one? It cannot fall solely on a part time member of staff who was at the desk at that given time. If it does make the company guilty how can they be safe printing any customers item?

I print thousands of licensed items every month accross a broad range of customers at trade level. This doesn't have a huge bearing on me so doesn't make much difference if this weren't the case. I don't have any written info on this but a discussion took place with people in the know. Like Social, it's the industry I work in. Nothing to gain by trying to convince people otherwise....... the opposite actually.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest