Janjan;45561 wrote:I take it by a couple of the replies the better option is to convert to refillable cartridges.
I use refillable cartridges because I use a printer better suited to refillable cartridges - Brother printers. I don't use my Epson printers now because (i) I don't like the flapping tubes and mucking about of the CISS, and (ii) Epson cartridges only hold a thimble-sized amount of ink. What's needed is a printer that takes large refillable cartridges and has them mounted remotely from the printhead. That's a Brother, but no authorised supplier or Sawgrass will look at you if you use Brother printers.
Janjan;45561 wrote:Is the 'thickness' of the black in any different to that of the other colours, or is it just coincidence that we keep getting problems on the black? I reverted back to plain ink cartridges last week and they seemed OK, a few missing lines on the nozzle check on the black, other than that was better than the CISS system.
I think different people get different problems with different colours. The fact of the matter is that dye-sub ink is thicker than regular dye-ink, and the printer was designed for dye-ink. There is no desktop inkjet printer that's been designed for dye-sub ink. When we put dye-sub ink in a desktop inkjet printer, we're asking for trouble - but we put up with it because there is no choice.
Some people say that the Ricoh printers handle dye-sub ink better because they were designed for a gel-based ink which is apparently thicker than regular dye-ink, so it should be better suited for the thicker dye-sub ink. That said, the Ricoh dye-sub ink isn't the same as the dye-sub ink we put into our CISS or refillables for Epson printers so YMMV.